A Trick of My Mind

The mind plays games. As I have aged, I look back on my earlier work (years and decades ago) and question whether it was me who made the photographs and wrote the essays. They seem to have been made by a more talented photographer and writer. These thoughts got stirred up while I was looking through a book that I made in 1998 called “Subconscious Perceptions”. 

The book consisted of an opening statement and an essay adapted from my MFA thesis titled “The Role of the Unconscious in the Creative Act”. The photographs have an overlaying sheet of vellum that contains a quote related to the unconscious. I hired a graphic designer to create the vellum overlays, the title page and to typeset the printed pages. When I view the book today, I am amazed by the effectiveness of the combination of words and images. Unfortunately, I could not find anyone interested in publishing the book.

I write better than I talk. I am a visual person. When I write, I prefer to use paper and pen. I can see my written work. When I talk, my words are unseen and invisible to my visual brain.

When looking back at my work, has time caused me to see things different? Is my aged vision causing a warping in the way I see? Is my mind reformatting information through different neural pathways? Where did the ideas, the big words, the creative photographs come from? Did I do that? Maybe it is just a trick of my mind.

Examples: The first image is the photo with the vellum sheet covering the page. The second image is with the vellum removed. The quote is from the book Bill Brandt Photographs 1928-1983 which was edited by Ian Jeffrey.

Words, Words, Words

I continue to discover new words that I had never heard of. It makes me think that I should have put more effort into expanding my vocabulary over the years but then that may have detracted from my visual endeavors. So much of life is a balancing act. A set of scales that measure experiences might help to keep some equanimity and balance. But we usually have priorities and for me it has been to create photographs, although lately I have been reading more which has resulted in my collection of words that were unknown to me.

In addition to stereoblindness (not able to see in 3D), prosopagnosia (face blindness) and erlebniskunst (art of experience), my latest addition is the word ekphrasis which is defined as writing inspired by art. Art can be in the form of a painting, photograph, film, sculpture or even a dance performance. A good example is my previous post regarding my photograph “Repose” and the accompanying description written by a gallery curator. Another example is my post “Olympia by Manet” and my writing about how I reacted to seeing the painting in person.

I always gave my photography students an assignment to select a photograph that interests them and to write about it. They had to provide a description (what they see), an interpretation (what they thought it was about), and an evaluation (whether they liked it or not and why). I was always surprised how insightful they were about the image they selected and the project served as a great teaching tool about art appreciation.

The next time you visit a museum or art gallery and have a strong reaction to a work of art that is emotionally moving you would be experiencing erlebniskunst. And if you go home and write about it that would be ekphrasis.

The Photographic Dilemma

I keep asking myself “What is wrong with fine art photography today?” I am seeing lackluster photographs with little originality that lack a “voice” and originality. They are mostly mundane and show little creativity on the part of the photographer. The only photos that spark my visual excitement were made many years ago. What is causing this image drought? Is it the inundation of the large quantity of mostly bland pictures that we face today? Is it poor photography education or simply a lack of dedication and direction? How much can be blamed on the curators and gallerists who control what is seen? Is there a fog of visual laziness hovering over the field of fine art photography? How long will it last?

It is likely, that in this age of digital interruption, photographers cannot concentrate for the long periods of time needed in the process of artistic pursuit which prevents deep brain thinking from occurring. I also believe social media has dampened visual acuity with the impersonal likes and thumbs up giving a false sense of importance. The New York Times has been highlighting portfolios of photos from photographers that an editor has been following on-line. At best they come across as beginning photographers with some potential and at worst they are individuals with a camera or camera phone who take snapshots.

I have to think much of the blame for the uninspired photo production lies with photographers. It does not appear that they are “putting in the work” and devoting enough time to photography. Inability to focus attention and a lack of concentration may be major contributors.

I am hoping this is only a temporary cycle and that there will be a photographic resurgence in the near future—a renaissance period. It will be up to a future generation of photographers, teachers, curators, critics and patrons to change what I see as a continued downward spiral into mediocrity for photography.

Classic Post-Emotional States of a Fine Art Photographer

Photography covers the full spectrum of personal emotions.  I want to address the various emotional states that the act of photographing can elicit in the photographer.  There are photo historians, photo critics and photo curators who write reviews, articles, essays and books about photography and they experience their own emotional states as a viewer of photographs and they address their feelings regarding what they see and feel.  Photographers, as the creator of images, experience their own set of emotions, which can be varied and intense over the course of creating a finished photograph. I have seen little writing by photographers regarding their emotions from start to finish in the act of creating a photograph. Edward Weston in his Daybooks is one of the best examples of a photographer expressing his emotions. My experience as a fine art photographer is that there are three phases in the photography process and different emotions are associated with each phase.  The phases are: (1) the planning phase, (2) the shooting phase, and (3) the processing phase. There can be a fourth phase, the “show and tell phase”, when and if the photographer decides to exhibit photographs for public viewing, but for now I will focus on the first three that involve image creation.

The phases and emotions discussed are directly related to “fine art photography” where the intent is to create an image that transcends the commonplace and can reach some level of the artistic.  I consider myself a “fine art photographer” or at least I strive to be one, but on occasion I am a “snapshooter” recording a family event or travel experience.  As a “snapshooter” I am more casual and do not experience the same emotions or the intensity of emotions when I am the “fine art photographer.”  For me they are very distinct and different experiences and seldom, if ever, overlap. For me, snapshots do not become fine art photographs.

The “planning phase” is when decisions are made on equipment, subject matter, location, and in my case a model when I work with the nude.  For some photographers there may be a spontaneous shooting experience where there is little or no pre-planning, but for me I find that it is a rare phenomenon.  I just have to get mentally ready and usually have to work out the details.  For me, spontaneity plays a strong role during the shooting phase.  

Emotions in the “planning phase” are related to the decisions you make and results that you hope to achieve.  Anticipation and excitement are emotions that can be countered with anxiety and self-doubt.  You look forward to the photo experience, but you wonder whether it will be successful and worth the effort.  Have you made the right decisions on equipment and location or will you regret your choices?  Will the model show up or cancel at the last minute?  Leading up to the “shooting phase,” the anxiety can build and I can get a little nervous.  I am already wondering whether I will be able to create at least one “strong” image or will the shoot be one big failure?  The intensity of these feelings can also be dependent on the resources (time and money) that have already been invested.

Some of the emotions from the “planning phase” can spill over into the “shooting phase,” but once the camera is in hand a new set of dynamics take over.  A level of intensity takes control and my focus centers on the environment, subject/model, lighting conditions, etc.  For varied time periods, from a few seconds to a few minutes, I may enter what is sometimes referred to as “the zone,” but I feel this term is too vague and does not adequately describe the photographer’s experience.  I originally thought that “period of intensified concentration” was more descriptive of these special moments, which can also apply to a writer, artist and other forms of creativity and even sports where someone may say that the player is in the “zone.”  After additional contemplation, I believe that specific to photography a more appropriate term is “period of intensified perception.”  Concentration certainly plays a major role, but the visual act of seeing is critical.  Sometimes this “period of intensified perception” is never attained or I may have to be visually engaged for an hour or two before I experience it.  When this does occur it may be the stage when areas of the brain are activated which can push creative thought into the realm referred to in psychological terms as the “subconscious” or “unconscious.” There is more information regarding this in my other writings, “The Role of the Unconscious in the Creative Act” and “The Role of the Unconscious in the Creative Act—New Discoveries and Updated Thoughts.”   Plus, using the term “period of intensified perception” is a more descriptive term that is more understandable for individuals not interested in the psychology of the mind.

Other emotions that I relate to the “shooting phase” include:  astonishment when everything comes together as you hoped it would; frustration and even disappointment when one or more various elements seem to prevent you from getting the image you think you want; surprise when something unexpected happens and you get a shot that you did not know existed. As you pack up your gear and call it quits, you may experience a sense of elation when you think everything went really well.  A good day shooting is no guarantee of a good set of images and a bad day can give you that one great image.  Sometimes you don’t know until you get to the “processing phase.”  When shooting digital and having the ability to review shots, I find it difficult to determine what is good and what is not while on location.  For the few photographers still using film, you definitely won’t know what you have until you are in the darkroom. I find it useful to put some time (days and even months) between a shoot and actually working with the images… sort of a cleansing of the visual palate.

The “processing phase” involves either developing film and printing it in the darkroom or developing a digital image with a software program and printing it with a digital printer.  I find that I spend about the same amount of time with either method when completing a finished print.  For me digital did not make photography easier.

My emotional experience with the “processing phase” starts with hope.  I hope exposures were accurate, the focus sharp, the lighting just right and that there will be at least one image that will jump out visually.  Sometimes elation can be tempered with disappointment.   An image that initially looked promising can become a reject upon closer inspection.  Of course, the opposite sometimes occurs when an image initially overlooked turns out to be one of my best shots to my dismay and amazement. I believe that all individuals interested in photography have an active sense of curiosity and take pride in achievement.  I also believe that all serious photographers will experience emotional ups and downs throughout their photographic lives.  Hopefully, there will be more days of satisfaction rather than disappointment, more days of happiness, enjoyment, and amazement, and fewer days of sorrow, despair and frustration.  Celebrate the good days and cope with the bad days, using them as a learning experience. Success and failure are part of the fabric of photography.

Note: I referred to this essay in the previous post (Photography and A.I)

Classic Post 3–Creators and Observers

I create my photographs but I do not interpret them. That is not my job. I let the observer do that. 

It is the observers’ job to discover their own interpretation. It is my hope that the viewer will emotionally connect with the image.

Today, we are visually saturated and I am concerned that the public does not really look at an image and try to discover what it is about. Simply indicating a social media “like” is not enough. We need more observers who are sensitive to aesthetic qualities in photographs.

I am also concerned that many of today’s photographers do not make images that go beyond the superficial surface of the subject whether it is animate or inanimate. Visually, many of the current images that I see lack depth and do not require anything more than a cursory glance. I subscribe to Aperture magazine and have noticed that the old adage that “a picture is worth a thousand words” should be changed to “it takes a thousand words to describe a photograph.” I now see many photos that cannot stand alone or even in a photo series without needing a lengthy critique which may vaguely explain or try to explain the significance of the work. It seems to me that photographers and writers are trying very hard to impress with their images and writings. Perhaps photographers lack the “vision” to create exceptional images and the writers use a lot of mumbo-jumbo to make themselves sound knowledgeable. We need more creators who see beyond the visually mundane.

There should be a visual relationship between the creator and the observer. The best photographs should create a spell on the observer.

Kant wrote the following about creative talent and genius. The talent/genius “does not know himself how he has come by his ideas; and he has not the power to devise the like at pleasure, or in accordance with a plan, and to communicate it to others in precepts that will enable them to produce similar products.”

There are photographs that I am unsure of how I created them and certainly will never be able to replicate. The technique of photography can be taught but the talent arises from the inner being.

The observer may experience similar emotions when viewing a photograph. The French have a phrase je ne sais quoi that refers to something that cannot be adequately described or expressed. Sometimes an image will leave the observer speechless and stir emotions and aesthetic senses.

The source of this emotional stirring and the connection to an image may be elusive and unexplainable. There are times when as an observer I relate to an image in such a way that verbal expression is neither possible nor necessary. I like numinous images-those that contain an element of mystery and appeal to the aesthetic sense.

It seems that the world is becoming more divided into creators and observers-those who make images and those who passively look. Unfortunately, there seems to be a dilution in talented creators and a diminished visual awareness of viewers. Some of this can be blamed on the barrage of images that the public is exposed to through modern technology but also blame can be directed to a lack of emphasis on visual literacy.

Mind Wandering

I seem to have an innate desire to get to the root of creativity even though I know it is an impossible task. I have previously written essays on the subject of creativity, especially as it relates to photography. The most recent book I read is Stolen Focus-Why You Can’t Pay Attention and How to Think Deeply Again by Johann Hari. Focus is not used as the photography term but the thinking term for clear perception and understanding.

Hari uses the phrase “mind wandering” which can result when the external stimuli are turned off and you can actually let your brain drift and think without interruption. The difficult part is that you have to stop the “noise.” You have to give your mind room and space to process thoughts. This means you have to slow down the input to your senses. A major benefit of turning off the hyper-world is regaining the ability to allow for mind wandering which can open the door for creativity. 

“Creativity is not (where you create) some new thing that’s emerged from your brain. It’s a new association between two things that were already there.” –Stolen Focus, page 96.

I question how one can be creative when trying to process all the external stimuli that bombards the senses non-stop. Unfortunately, many people are so conditioned by this constant “noise” that they find it difficult to turn off the hyper-world. How many people can turn off their electronic devices for a day without feeling anxious?

Whether you are a photographer or not, give your mind room to wander, slow down the unnecessary external stimulation and take the time to observe and interact with your environment. 

Uprooted Series (in camera double exposure on film)

Looking at the World at a Slight Angle

John Banville in his book April in Spain uses the phrase “looking at the world at a slight angle.” It resonated with me to the extent that I jotted it on a small scrap of paper and ruminated about how many of my best images were created when things were viewed at a slight angle. This does not mean that you walk around with your head cocked to one side to change your angle of view but that your skills of perception are sensitive to something unique, maybe an unusual juxtaposition, or “something never seen before”—a challenge that I assigned my photo students. Of course, this concept of “looking at the world at a slight angle” is not something that can be easily turned off and on.

As I have previously written in essays, I believe the unconscious plays a major role in this ability to see at a slight angle. As a photographer, the term I use when my vision blends with the deep layers inside my brain is the “period of intensive perception.” This is where I experience being in a state of mind that is momentarily removed from reality and my visual sensitivity reaches a new level. Everything seems to slow down and there is an increased level of clarity. I see things that I did not see moments earlier. This is when creativity is elevated which results in some of my best work. Unfortunately, it is elusive. It is easy to talk and write about but most difficult to execute.